Malicious code on websites is a serious threat to privacy and security online.  Malicious code, can be used to steal personal information.  Web code can be used to track your location, and compromise your privacy.  This is especially worrisome if you are intentionally trying to hide your true identity.  Of course, the most common use for malicious web code is profit for the crooks who write the code.  Your computer may become “infected” with fake viruses that prompt you time and time again to buy useless “antivirus” software, or just for the heck of it, your credit card number or social security number could be lifted from web forms.  It is important to be vigilant against this threat, especially if you not a tech savvy computer user.

Fortunately, there are tools to help you protect yourself from these attacks.  NoScript is an extraordinarily useful plugin for Firefox that keeps your personal data private and protects you from unwanted intrusions into your computer.  NoScript is simple, easy to use, and intuitively blocks scripts, plugins and other code that could be used to compromise your computer during visits to a website.

After you install NoScript, you are going to notice just how prevalent scripts and java are on modern websites.  You will notice that most websites just do not work without them.  By default, NoScript blocks all scripts.  Fortunately, it is easy to allow scripts on a site by site basis.  If you trust a site, for example, your bank, you will allow all scripts to run. The benefit is clear.  The first time you visit a site, NoScript will completely block all scripts.  If you decide to trust the site, you can allow scripts, but if you are on a questionable site, you can decide to leave the scripts blocked.

A good example of the usefulness of NoScripts appears on the site stayinvisible.com.  With Javascript disabled by NoScript, Stay Invisible, can detect only your external IP address.  In my case, it is the IP address of my proxy server.  Stay Invisible, gives you are warning that you are “visible” because you have javascript disabled, but this is not the case.  Disabling Javascript has prevented the site from capturing a good deal of private information that you may not want disclosed.

When scripts are allowed, the site can gather your real IP address, and much more about your computer.  Malicious scripts can be written to gather much more personal information about you and your computer.  If you are interested in protecting your privacy, and you do not want certain sites that you visit to know who you are, you must disable certain scripts on that site.  There is another option as well.  If you use a VPN type proxy, the JavaScript will not be able to circumvent the proxy and your real IP will not be disclosed.  This makes a VPN type proxy superior to a regular HTTP or SOCKS proxy for web browsing.

Scripts Blocked

NoScripts blocks unwanted and dangerous scripts

Scripts allowed
When scripts are allowed, the site can gather a great deal of information about your system. They don’t have to tell you they are gathering this information and can use it for whatever purpose they please.

So you’re off on your yearly family vacation. You are prepared for the growing list of inconveniences at the airport.  You wear slip on shoes, and ensure that your children do the same.  You don’t wear a belt or carry change in your pocket.  No deodorant, medicine, sunscreen, or hygiene items in your carry on bags.  OK we are ready to go.  Well not quite.

Newly implemented technology and “Advanced pat down” techniques ensure that you and your family will either be seen naked, or have your genitals manhandled before you are allowed on the aircraft.  According to new policy, if you opt out of the full body scanner treatment, you will receive an advanced pat down with a complimentary genital groping.   According to TSA chief John Pistole, “The patdown is unavoidably intrusive, embarrassing, uncomfortable…”.  Need I say more?

Of course you need not be subject to the pat down.  All you and your children have to do to avoid it is go through the body scanner.  Don’t worry though.  The TSA claims that the agent cannot see your face, and cannot interact with you.  The TSA also claims that it does not save any of the images(however, it does not state that another agency or company does not store the images).  That’s good, because the scanner does not leave much to the imagination.

I feel safer already

Now, I know we need to be vigilant in our efforts to stop people from using airplanes as weapons against our nation, but is all this humiliation and degradation really necessary?  Do they have to feel up my children or view them naked?  I guess I will need to explain to them that it is OK if the TSA thug touches them in their private areas, because they are agents of the government.  They are just making us safe.  But are they really making us safe?  What are they really protecting us from?  An underwear bomber?  A shoe bomber?  What happens when the religious zealot shoves C4 up his rectum to blow up a plane?  Will the TSA make cavity searches the next mandatory search?  Why not?  It will save me a trip to the proctologist, and I don’t have to fly after all.

The real rub here is that these machines really will not make us any safer.  They will only give people the illusion that the government is protecting us, while simultaneously indoctrinating Americans and enculturating heavy handed government authority into our every day lives.

In my opinion this is a violation of our right to privacy and to be free from unreasonable search.  The government does not have the right to violate our constitutional rights simply because we have a choice.  Of course we do have a choice.  We will not be getting on a plane unless we submit to the humiliating roughhousing or peepshow. We are still free to drive or take the bus, but of course, that is a privilege too.  At what point do we stop allowing the government to trample our rights in the name of exercising our privileges?  The right to be free from unreasonable search is not dependent on whether we choose to fly.  We have that right, no matter the choices we make.  That is, if we fight for it.

A French agency that reports to the French Ministry of Culture dubbed “Hadopi” has been scouring the internet for months, harvesting the IP addresses of French citizens who have downloaded copyrighted materials .  By law, the ISP must hand over the email address of the customer hadopi has determined is guilty of downloading music or movies.

The anti-piracy law was passed after years of heavy lobbying by the SCPP, a French organization that appears to be similar to the RIAA and MPAA in the United States.  The SCPP claims that listening to music that was freely downloaded off the internet costs France’s music industry $978 million per year.

But it is much more complicated to calculate the true cost of free music to the French music industry.  It costs the music industry exactly $0 to put the music on the internet.  Each user that downloads the music costs the industry exactly $0.  Each time a French citizen listens to the music they downloaded for free, it costs the French music industry exactly $0.  So, $0 times the number of songs downloaded and listened to equals $0.  Huh, maybe that was not so complicated.

hadopi

Look Honey! The government is shutting off our internet for a year because we did not know how to secure our internet connection! Thanks Hadopi!

Of course the SCPP does not mean that piracy actually costs the music industry any money.  That is just clever way to say that the music industry has failed to capitalize on an opportunity, and blame those who have failed to increase their wealth.  It is actually the consumer’s fault for not buying their product when it is available for free.  What they are saying is that the music industry could make $978 million more per year if there were tough laws in place to prevent free distribution of music.

And pass tough laws is exactly what France did.  The law specifies that no matter who actually downloaded music or movies, the owner of the connection is responsible.  Three strikes and you can be barred from accessing the internet for a year.  And what of those who are not tech savvy enough to secure their internet connections?  Well thankfully, hadopi is writing instructions to help people protect themselves from those who would use their internet connection.  Very kind of them.  Maybe hadopi should have written instructions for the music industry detailing how the they can increase profits without trampling the civil rights of millions of French citizens.

© 2011 anonymise Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha